SWT method
In: local elastic-plastic strain methods->uniaxial methods
The SWT criterion is one of the most often used method. Its definition is in fact based on a specific mean stress effect incorporation:
Note that the mean stress effect projects only into the Basquin's part of the e-N curve (i.e. to the high-cycle fatigue above all). Negative mean stress is expected to be non-damaging and its value is reset to zero. The conversion to an equivalent value allows a use of the common uniaxial rain-flow decomposition. The choice of the appropriate decomposition method is the point in Calculation Methods window, where the way of the tensor's reduction is chosen.
Note: As regards some results of the criterion's usability, my personal experience says that this solution is substantially conservative. (Jan Papuga).
Nomenclature:
Mark |
Unit |
PragTic variable |
Meaning |
[MPa] |
stress amplitude |
||
[MPa] |
mean stress |
||
[-] |
strain amplitude |
||
E |
[MPa] |
E |
tensile modulus |
[MPa] |
SIG_F |
fatigue strength coefficient |
|
[-] |
EPS_F |
fatigue ductility coefficient |
|
b |
[-] |
EXP_B |
fatigue strength exponent |
c |
[-] |
EXP_C |
fatigue ductility exponent |
N |
[-] |
number of cycles to crack initiation |
- Rain-flow with von Mises reduction
- Rain-flow with Tresca reduction
- Rain-flow with von Mises (signed) reduction
Elasto-plasticity
- No
- Neuber elastic-plastic accommodation
- Glinka elastic-plastic accommodation
Material parameters
E |
[MPa] |
tensile modulus |
NU |
[-] |
Poisson’s ratio |
SIG_F |
[MPa] |
fatigue strength coefficient |
EPS_F |
[-] |
fatigue ductility coefficient |
EXP_B |
[-] |
fatigue strength exponent |
EXP_C |
[-] |
fatigue ductility exponent |
© PragTic, 2007
This help file has been generated by the freeware version of HelpNDoc